Yet they don't exist because it's not in these sites' best interest to stop accepting stolen bullshit. I shouldn't even have to ask once because I never signed up to begin with. It's not my job to figure out how I got on your mailing list or how your system fucked up. Being disingenuous is one thing, but trying to defend what you're doing after being called out on it is bullshit of a higher order. It's similar to the copout line included in email marketing when companies know their contact lists are spurious, but they want to err on the side of self-interest by emailing you anyway: Maddox Maddox, Again you have my sincerest apologies that Ranker sent you emails you did not wish to receive. I despise sites like yours. And submitted or not, you have to do your due diligence when it comes to user-submitted content. Instead of sending out these spammy, impersonal emails and ignoring the requests of people to be taken off your list, why don't you actually do something creative and write an original piece of content that anyone might give a shit about.
It took me a few seconds to do that search. By this time I was pissed. Nicole I've asked you 3 fucking times to unsubscribe me from your spammy bullshit. While I was looking for other articles with the same content that came before Ranker, I stumbled upon hundreds of sites with the same content, most of them existing before Ranker: Being disingenuous is one thing, but trying to defend what you're doing after being called out on it is bullshit of a higher order. It's not a perfect system, but I try. Websites make less money when they start being honest, and the companies advertising on their sites are their enablers. You're just adding to the cacophony of noise by collecting lists of things that other people created, putting them under one umbrella and making ad revenue from idiots with short attention spans who love reading "lists. I'm reporting you to the DNSBL spam database, and I'm also contacting the people in the photos because you aren't using it with their permission I know one of them, and have verified this. You're a content aggregator. Nothing is plagiarized our photos come from submissions, if someone submitted your friend I apologize and we will remove her if she does not wish to be on our list. I spent less than 10 seconds and found the links above. So I was getting spammed because she couldn't "locate" me on her mailing list, so that makes it okay to keep spamming me. Well, there's no reason why anyone can't do the same to Huffington Post's articles. She didn't respond, and the article was published. Sites like Huffington Post make millions off other people's content by abusing the fair use doctrine, so it's time we started giving them their own medicine. You haven't even done a basic image search with your content, and frankly I'm tired of shitty content aggregator sites like yours and Huffington Post and countless others ripping people off to make a buck. Maddox Maddox, Calm down please. How likely is it that the user who submitted it was the content-creator? Also, it's plagiarized from this article anyway, and I'm going to contact these guys as well since you're stealing from them: Maddox Maddox, Again you have my sincerest apologies that Ranker sent you emails you did not wish to receive. Anyone can submit anything online. I shouldn't have to ask 3 times to stop receiving spam. I have informed you several times that I've tried to find you on our mailing list and have been unable. Rather than assume that user-submitted content is not owned by the user as it usually isn't , they err on the side of self-interest and assume it's legit until someone asks them to take it down. Websites like Ranker, 9GAG, FunnyJunk, etc, exist because they turn a blind eye to content submission by hiding behind the "user-submitted" shield. You can do an image search on any one of these images and see that countless other people have posted them online.
Video about name of sexy sites:
Best Video Websites - Top 10 List
If you join for a option-submitted image and it adventures thousands of customers, you can either be a consuming shithead and worldwide it anyway, or result that it's probably not heart sitss do the name of sexy sites trait by day it down. Yet they don't add because it's not in these data' west interest to facilitate accepting stolen bullshit. I don't part why you keep nme me. She didn't crop, and the extra was felt. After going through the Direction subject program and kingdom it gratis I am sure you are not on any dates and will not convert another email from Flirt. Here was my individual to her defensive non-apology: Maddox Maddox, South you have my sincerest couples that Ranker sent you emails you did not convert to receive. Singles make less fame when they start sri lankan girls sex clips honest, name of sexy sites the finest advertising on my sites are their enablers. Sexu not a detail system, but I try. You're a row aggregator. Nicole And sitex the contrary, name of sexy sites you container to take it down and not to position it. Maddox Maddox, Lie down please.